Multi-accounts in online casinos: what are they and why are they prohibited

In online gambling, every player’s action is carefully tracked, forming their unique digital profile. When the system detects multiple interconnected accounts, it’s not just an error but a signal for immediate verification. This phenomenon is called multi-accounting.

What is multi-accounting and why is it strictly prohibited? This practice of creating multiple accounts with the aim of unfairly obtaining bonuses or circumventing rules carries serious risks and always leads to the player being blocked and losing all winnings. In this article, we will delve into the essence of multi-accounts in online casinos, methods of detection, and the inevitable consequences.

Curaçao and MGA Approaches to Combating Multi-Accounting in Online Casinos

Curaçao eGaming and Malta Gaming Authority licenses have long included a mandatory “one player – one account” policy. The documentation holds responsibility not only for users but also for online casinos: violating policies on combating multi-accounts can result in fines, license revocations, or operational suspensions.

A platform licensed by Curaçao must document a scheme as an incident, conduct an investigation, document actions, and provide evidence within 48 hours. In case of recurrence, a directive for adjusting the business model will follow. MGA, on the other hand, requires the implementation of behavioral fraud detection analytical solutions and biometric filters. This is how an operator maintains legitimacy.

Regulatory APIs and Centralized Blacklists

Since 2023, several jurisdictions have launched a cross-casino alerting system – a protocol for exchanging signals between operators. Multi-accounts in online casinos are not only detected within a specific platform but also included in unified databases integrated through APIs. When registering on another platform, the system checks IP, email, devices, payments, and flags from previous blocks.

A player blocked for multi-accounting on a platform licensed by Kahnawake automatically receives a verification denial on platforms using shared data pools. In other words, digital anonymity is a thing of the past.

Fraudulent Schemes: How Multi-Accounts are Created in Online Casinos

The mechanics of multi-accounts in online casinos evolve alongside protective mechanisms. Simple clones with identical IPs no longer work – more complex schemes are now used.

Division through Anti-Detection Browsers

A player launches 10-30 sessions simultaneously, each with a unique browser configuration. Parameters such as User Agent, WebRTC, Canvas, AudioContext, geolocation, and system language are altered. With proper setup, no fingerprints match. Services like Multilogin or Indigo facilitate management but leave vulnerabilities in behavior pattern analysis.

SIM Cards and Documents: Manual Part of the Scheme

Each account receives a unique number for SMS verification. SIM cards are purchased in bulk, manually activated, and destroyed after registration. Often, fake KYC documentation is used – passport generators, utility bill templates, and fake addresses. However, when attempting withdrawals, platforms request video verification, leading to the scheme’s collapse.

Interaction Between Multi-Accounts

To avoid connections, multi-accounts do not conduct transactions between each other. Funds are transferred through buffer wallets or mixers, masking routes. In games, a scout is used to analyze weak slots, while the main account enters later to maximize RTP peak withdrawals. In tournaments, accounts synchronize to maintain positions in rankings.

Financial Consequences for Platforms: Figures and Risks

Multi-accounts in online casinos disrupt the economic model. Each unit of fake traffic incurs costs from bonuses to account maintenance. Statistics from major platforms show that 5-8% of all registrations can be attributed to multi-accounts. This amounts to tens of thousands of dollars monthly – in bonuses alone.

The average damage from one organized multi-accounting with 10-15 accounts:

• Around $3,000 in bonuses and free spins;
• $1,200 in cashbacks and tournaments;
• $800 on transaction fees;
• $2,500 – churn of real players due to trust decline.

Resulting in up to $7,500 per case, which can repeat dozens of times monthly.

Legal Consequences: When Multi-Accounts in Online Casinos Violate the Law

Violation of platform policies is just the tip of the iceberg. Multi-accounts in online casinos enter the realm of criminal law under certain conditions. Jurisdictions with clearly defined concepts of digital fraud, such as Germany, Canada, and the UK, are particularly interested.

When withdrawing funds obtained from bonus schemes through third-party services (cryptocurrency exchanges, P2P platforms), money laundering occurs. In GDPR- and KYC-regulated countries, such actions form a legal basis for prosecution. Playing with fake documents can lead to 3 to 5 years of imprisonment in EU countries.

Detecting multi-accounts in online casinos can trigger an automatic mechanism to notify regulators. In some systems, like Isle of Man or Gibraltar, agreements between platforms and financial supervisory authorities require operators to report potential abuse schemes. Thus, even one unauthorized account can prompt legal scrutiny, fund freezes, and criminal liability.

Key Vulnerabilities

With a strategic approach, an operator can prevent up to 95% of multi-account creation in online casinos by addressing commonly exploited loopholes. It is critical to analyze and address the following vulnerabilities:

1. Lack of browser and device fingerprinting.
2. Possibility of registration with temporary emails.
3. Delayed or non-automated KYC verification.
4. Weak CAPTCHA settings.
5. Bonus linkage only to the account, not the device.
6. Inadequate verification of IP addresses, proxies, and VPNs.
7. Missing blacklists of SIM cards and telcos.
8. Weak analytics of behavioral patterns.
9. Ineffective monitoring of login and logout frequencies.
10. Ignoring anomalies in tournament participation.

Technical and Behavioral Methods of Combat

Platforms implement anti-fraud engines capable of identifying multi-accounts in online casinos based on micro-behaviors. Examples include rapid tab switching, identical registration times, and uniform section navigation. Advanced biometrics through WebGL and cursor trajectory analysis help create a unique behavioral profile. Even when using anti-detection browsers, each user leaves a distinct digital “fingerprint.” If a match exceeds 80%, the algorithm triggers a manual review.

Mobile applications analyze screen tilt level, click frequency, and press strength – distinguishing real actions from scripts. This approach reduces the success rate of multi-account implementation in online casinos to statistical insignificance.

Conclusion

Multi-accounts in online casinos are not disappearing. With each new protection protocol, a new circumvention solution emerges. With active operator engagement, smart fingerprinting, and regulatory coordination, fraudsters have less maneuvering space.

The future lies in systems that do not catch violators but warn them before entering the platform. At the core of this transformation are multi-accounts in online casinos as the main indicator of anti-fraud maturity. The platform sets the architecture of trust, not the player defining the rules.